Coleman, Benjamin Longden | Day 2

Farmer & Market Gardener Employing 22 Men 13 Boys (240 Acres)

Applied to Mr Emmerson to manage election. Received two sums of £40 and £50. The first was to engage Public Houses.


Witness Type: Briber, Treater

Party: Liberal


Witness Testimony:

  • 1210.

    It was given to you for that purpose ? — Yes.

  • 1211.

    Was anything said about whether the whole of it was to be devoted to that purpose, or was it left to your discretion ? — It was left to my discretion. There was nothing more said.

  • 1212.

    Nothing more was said at that time except that you were to keep the expenses down ? — No.

  • 1213.

    To keep the public-house bills down for supplying refreshments to your friends. Did you go round to these public-houses each day and pay the accounts ? — I might not have gone each day, I went several times.

  • 1214.

    I see the ‘King’s Arms’ is 6L ? — Yes.

  • 1215.

    Had you any account from them ? — They gave me a receipt.

  • 1216.

    Had you any account from them of what had been supplied ? — No particulars.

  • 1217.

    You paid the 5L. upon their telling you that they had supplied that amount ? — Yes, upon their faith.

  • 1218.

    Did you pay that sum all at one time ? — All at one time.

  • 1219.

    You did not go round from day to day then ? — Some houses I did.

  • 1220.

    You had no vouchers from them ? — I believe I have.

  • 1221.

    You have a receipt I know, but no bill with particulars ? — No.

  • 1222.

    You took their statement that they had supplied 5L. worth ? — They produced their slate in some instances, reckoned it up at so much, and I gave them the money.

  • 1223.

    You had no bill from the ” King’s Arms ” ? — No.

  • 1224.

    The next is the “Green Posts,” 10L. Had you any particulars of that ? — None.

  • 1225.

    Was that paid in one sum or several ? — I paid it twice. I asked him for a receipt for the 102. I believe I paid him twice.

  • 1226.

    Are you sure, was it not one sum ? — 10L in one sum. I paid him twice. He gave me a receipt for 10L. Up to that date that is what I paid him.

  • 1227.

    Are you sure it was one sum. You would not pay the first 5L. without taking a receipt ? — It was half a sovereign or something like that

  • 1228.

    Half a sovereign the first time, and 9L. 10s. the second ? — Yes.

  • 1229.

    Without any particulars ? — He simply produced his book, his slate, with a few names.

  • 1230.

    You say first a book, then a slate. Did he produce a slate or a book, or did he produce nothing. Just think, was anything produced to you at all ? — I remember at the “Bricklayer’s Arms” he had a slate.

  • 1231.

    The ‘Green Posts’ ? — A book he took from his drawer.

  • 1232.

    Are you sure of that ? — Yes.

  • 1233.

    Was that amount exactly 10L. ? — I cannot say. I asked him for a receipt for 10L.

  • 1234.

    The first is the “King’s Arms” which is exactly 5L., and the next is the ” Green Posts,” 10L. Do you mean that there were entries of goods supplied to different persons to the exact amount of 10L. ? — It might not have been the exact amount. He gave me a receipt for 10L., and the other account would run. I paid no odd money at the “King’s Arms.” I paid 5L, but to the best of my recollection were was 17s., 6d. due at the time.

  • 1235.

    Was there more due at the ‘Green Posts’ than at the ‘King’s Arms’ ? — There might have been some odd shillings due at the time, being large sums, If they were small ones I cleared them up. Being large amounts I paid the pounds and left the odd shillings. That is the system.

  • 1236.

    Were they to go on supplying then ? — Yes

  • 1237.

    They were ? — I endeavoured to check it as much as I could.

  • 1238.

    Did you endeavour to check it by paying ? — Yes.

  • 1239.

    Did you check it ? — I told them not to make it too heavy.